Resources

Proof, patterns, and practical answers.

Explore case studies from complex research programs and real-world service delivery—plus the answers teams typically need before moving forward.

Case Studies FAQs
One core platform. Multiple applications.
Research EDC, QG-Case case management, and the LifePath Portal all run on the same secure foundation— configured to fit different workflows, users, and reporting needs.
Audit-ready
HIPAA-aligned controls and access tracking.
Flexible
Forms, registries, dashboards, and integrations.
Multi-role
Participants, staff, providers, and admins.
Scalable
From pilots to large networks and cohorts.
Case studies + FAQs
Evidence from the field, plus answers to implementation, security, and workflow questions.

Case Studies

Highlights from the current QuesGen case studies library. These examples reflect how teams use QuesGen for high-scale research operations and streamlined case management reporting.

CARE Consortium

Large-scale concussion research network

Supporting a major concussion study across military academies and NCAA programs—high participant volume, complex data capture, and long-term longitudinal follow-up.

Learn more

TRACK-TBI

Multi-site traumatic brain injury study

A long-running, nationwide effort enrolling thousands of participants spanning mild to severe TBI, requiring consistent workflows and clean, queryable datasets.

Learn more

CHOP Violence Intervention Program

Service delivery + outcomes reporting

Streamlining data and reporting as a hospital-based violence intervention program scales—turning day-to-day casework into measurable outcomes without crushing staff time.

Learn more

City of San Jose

QG-Case: reduced casework overhead

A violence intervention program modernized its workflows through QG-Case—reducing tedious data work so teams can focus on people, not paperwork.

Learn more

CENTER-TBI

International research coordination

Coordinating data across dozens of sites in multiple countries—standardizing workflows while supporting local operational realities.

Learn more

ReCODE Alzheimer’s Study

Lifestyle protocol + outcomes tracking

A comprehensive protocol examining cognitive outcomes—supporting structured data capture alongside longitudinal measurement and reporting.

Learn more

NICoE Military TBI Neuroimaging

Large imaging volumes + structured metadata

Enabling a major military neuroimaging TBI initiative—supporting high data volumes and coordinating the operational flow required for reliable, queryable study data.

Learn more

Frequently Asked Questions

The most common questions teams ask when evaluating QuesGen for research, case management, and participant-facing portals.

Ask a question

They all use the same core, HIPAA-compliant, scalable platform, but tailored to meet each of the specific requirements. The differences are in configuration, workflow, role permissions, and reporting—not in the underlying security and data foundation.

Academic research teams, hospital programs, public agencies, and community-based organizations that need secure workflows for sensitive data—often across multiple sites, teams, or partners.

No. QuesGen supports clinical research operations (EDC and longitudinal studies) and also supports operational service delivery through case management workflows (QG-Case) and participant-facing engagement via portals like LifePath.

Many pilots start quickly when requirements are clear: define roles, forms, workflows, and the initial reporting outputs. The critical path is usually approvals, data elements, and integration needs—not the platform itself.

Yes—QuesGen is designed around configurable data capture (forms, instruments, questionnaires) and repeatable workflows. For advanced use cases, teams can extend behavior and integrations, but most capture and reporting can be configured.

Yes. QuesGen supports site-based access controls, scoped datasets, and role-based permissions so organizations can collaborate while sharing only the appropriate information.

Access is role-based and designed for least-privilege workflows. Audit trails, user accountability, and structured permissions support oversight and compliance expectations for sensitive programs.

Operational dashboards, program outcomes, research exports, funder reports, and case/status pipelines. You can build views by site, cohort, provider, team, time period, and other dimensions that matter for decisions.

Yes. QuesGen supports integrations and APIs for exchanging data with partner systems. Integration approach depends on your data sources, identity strategy, and whether you want push, pull, or batch workflows.

SDOH programs often require flexible questionnaires, repeated follow-ups, referrals, and outcomes tracking across partners. QuesGen supports structured capture, longitudinal tracking, and reporting that aligns to program requirements and funder needs.

QuesGen can generate structured exports aligned to study definitions or reporting templates. Exports can be scheduled or produced on-demand, and can be scoped based on site/role permissions.

A typical implementation covers: requirements and roles, data model setup, form/workflow configuration, reporting outputs, user onboarding, and (if needed) integrations. The goal is a stable system your team can operate confidently.
Want these FAQs to reflect your exact product language?
If you paste your latest solutions positioning (or the current sections in your generated site), I can tighten the phrasing so it matches your final names, claims, and feature set.
Talk to us

Turn care plans into measurable outcomes.

Whether you’re running a multi-site study, building a population health program, or enabling person-centered care, QuesGen delivers planning, tracking, and outcomes measurement on one coherent platform.

Talk to our team
Fast response • Practical guidance • Built for complex workflows